cec logoAlabama Federation CEC (AFCEC) logo with pictures of kids
 
Alabama
Federation CEC

officers

membership

conference

publications

constitution

CEC mission

related links

AFCEC homepage

teacher and girl doing schoolwork
TIPS FOR TEACHERS
Increasing Students’ Academic and Social Success: Proven Tactics for Helping Students Avoid Forgetting

Nature of the Tactics
Tactics to reduce forgetting among students refers to methods that influence all types of learning: concept learning, discrimination learning, verbal learning, motor learning, problem solving, and dealing with connected discourse. The following tactics have been researched repeatedly over the past century and the effectiveness of their results is well-documented.

Tactics to Reduce Forgetting Among Students

 •Degree of Original Learning
 •Type of retention Measure
 •Instructions to Recall
 •Reminiscence
Degree of Original Learning
Original learning refers to the extent to which a student has mastered a unit of study during the initial, or acquisition, stage of learning. Assume that we defined initial mastery as the first occasion on which the student achieved 100% on a test of the unit of study.  If the teacher moves on to another unit of study following the occasion of the student's initial mastery, the student will forget much of the content of that unit of study after only a few days' time. One of the best tactics to combat forgetting is over learning. Over learning refers to practice beyond the point of initial mastery.  For instance, if the student achieved initial mastery following the 10th session of original learning, we could practice half again as long as it took to reach initial mastery (i.e., five additional sessions, or 150% over learning).  Or, we could practice for ten additional sessions following initial mastery (i.e., 200% over learning).  The degree of over learning has an crucial influence on forgetting and greatly increases retention of previously learned material.  Over learning should always implemented to at least the 150% level. On the other hand, research shows that over learning beyond the 200% level costs more in time and effort than it benefits retention.

Type of Retention Measure
Estimates of how much material a student remembers depend on the type of measure used. For example, a recognition measure requires the student to select from among an array of choices (e.g., a multiple-choice test).  A structured-recall measure requires the student to produce or supply responses within a specific context (e.g., short-answer and essay tests). Finally, relearning or savings measures estimate the time it takes for the student to relearn previously learned material. The different measures provide different estimates of retention even when they are based on the same learned material. Recognition produces the highest estimates of retention, structured-recall produces the lowest estimates of retention, and relearning falls in the middle.  Ultimately, the retention measure to use is the one demanded in real-life situations. Frequently, that measure is structured recall, the most difficult estimate of retention to attain.  As an intermediate tactic, the teacher may use easier recognition tests in order to promote self-esteem and confidence, so long as ultimate mastery and retention is measured by structured recall tests.

Instructions to Recall
Instructions to recall refers to explicit directions to the student regarding what to remember. This may take the form of simply informing the student that there will be a test covering the day's material on Thursday, or the directions may refer to a set of objectives for which the students are responsible.  Although many teachers find it aggravating when students ask, "Will this be on the test?," the student has a point if significant amounts of class time are devoted to material for which the student is not responsible. Just as students learn best when they learn intentionally, they also forget less when they are explicitly instructed to remember.

Reminiscence
Reminiscence is the increase in performance that occurs during a rest period that follows a lengthy massed practice session.  With large amounts of massed practice, interference and confusion increase. Such massed practice leads to more proactive and retroactive inhibition, which decreases performance. For instance, when students study all night preparing for an important examination and complete the examination with little or no sleep, their performance suffers because of extraneous and harmful effects that mask learning (e.g., they feel tired, hungry, grubby, and unmotivated).  With rest, the effects dissipate, and previous learning is unmasked. Teachers can explain the influence of reminiscence to their students, and can warn them against long study sessions. They can encourage short, but frequent, study sessions.  In addition, they can be sure to allow a rest period following a lengthy practice session in school before measuring students' retention.

........................................................................................................................................
One of a series of documents prepared by Auburn University special education faculty
as contracted by the Alabama State Improvement Grant to promote positive change in the public schools. 

officers  |  membership | conference | publications | constitution | cec mission | related links  | afcec home
for more information: riceric@auburn.edu

spacer